))
How to Review Your Mistakes (Ep. 470)
Manage episode 437642045 series 3014938
Indhold leveret af Nathan Fox and Ben Olson, Nathan Fox, and Ben Olson. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Nathan Fox and Ben Olson, Nathan Fox, and Ben Olson eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.
LSAT growth comes from thoroughly reviewing your mistakes. But what does a thorough review look like? Ben and Nathan describe their approach and explain why they don’t recommend keeping a wrong answer journal. The guys also compare law school to wizard school. They reject an impatient admissions strategy. And they consider potential risks associated with the military’s Funded Legal Education Program.
1:31 - Confusing Writing - In a new study, cognitive scientists at MIT explain why legalese is so difficult to understand.
9:13 - Improving in RC - An anonymous listener has been told that they won’t improve much in Reading Comprehension. Ben and Nathan tell Anonymous to ignore the haters.
14:18 - Review - Nathan and Ben advocate a deep review of every mistake. But keeping a wrong answer journal is likely a waste of time.
26:42 - Apply Now or Later? - Is it better to apply early with a subpar LSAT or to apply late with a great LSAT? Ben and Nathan ask: Why pick the lesser of two evils when you can avoid the evil entirely?
34:49 - Comparative RC Passages - The guys outline their approach to comparative passages in Reading Comprehension.
37:28 - JAG and FLEP - An LSAT Demon student warns listeners about potential risks associated with the military’s Funded Legal Education Program.
48:28 - Word of the Week - You can mollify your test anxiety by improving at the test.
486 episoder
Del
