Artwork

Indhold leveret af HPS@UniMelb Samara Greenwood. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af HPS@UniMelb Samara Greenwood eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå offline med appen Player FM !

S1 Ep12 - Fiona Fidler on Collective Objectivity

21:03
 
Del
 

Manage episode 374447189 series 3480404
Indhold leveret af HPS@UniMelb Samara Greenwood. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af HPS@UniMelb Samara Greenwood eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

"It wouldn’t make sense to leave the entire burden of upholding objectivity in science on the shoulders of fallible individuals, right?" Prof. Fiona Fidler

To finish off our inaugural season with a bang – today’s episode features the visionary researcher who initiated the idea for the podcast – Professor Fiona Fidler.
Fiona is head of our History and Philosophy of Science Program at the University of Melbourne and co-lead of the MetaMelb research initiative.
In this episode Fiona first discusses her early move from psychology to HPS when she was struck by the ‘dodgy’ statistical methods she found prevalent in many sciences. She has since dedicated her career to studying scientific practice to help improve confidence in scientific claims.
Fiona introduces us to the concept of ‘Collective Objectivity’. Following from an earlier podcast on 'Values in Science' by Rachel Brown, Fiona discusses how contemporary understandings of objectivity have become more sophisticated.
Rather than viewing objectivity in science as solely the role of individuals, today we understand there are strong social dimensions to ensuring scientific outcomes are not unduly biased. As Fiona discusses, this not only requires diversity in 'who does science' to ensure multiple perspectives are incorporated, but we also need multiple collective review mechanisms to ensure we are developing truly robust, reliable, objective outcomes.

Current research shows our current community-level systems are no longer adequate for today’s complex scientific world. Fiona forcefully argues that what is required is heavy investment in establishing stronger collective mechanisms for reinforcing the goals of scientific objectivity.
Some links related to this episode can be found below:

A transcript of this episode can be found here: https://www.hpsunimelb.org/post/episode-12-transcript

Thanks for listening to The HPS Podcast with your current hosts, Samara Greenwood and Carmelina Contarino.
You can find more about us on our blog, website, bluesky, twitter, instagram and facebook feeds.
This podcast would not be possible without the support of School of Historical and Philosophical Studies at the University of Melbourne.
www.hpsunimelb.org

  continue reading

38 episoder

Artwork
iconDel
 
Manage episode 374447189 series 3480404
Indhold leveret af HPS@UniMelb Samara Greenwood. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af HPS@UniMelb Samara Greenwood eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

"It wouldn’t make sense to leave the entire burden of upholding objectivity in science on the shoulders of fallible individuals, right?" Prof. Fiona Fidler

To finish off our inaugural season with a bang – today’s episode features the visionary researcher who initiated the idea for the podcast – Professor Fiona Fidler.
Fiona is head of our History and Philosophy of Science Program at the University of Melbourne and co-lead of the MetaMelb research initiative.
In this episode Fiona first discusses her early move from psychology to HPS when she was struck by the ‘dodgy’ statistical methods she found prevalent in many sciences. She has since dedicated her career to studying scientific practice to help improve confidence in scientific claims.
Fiona introduces us to the concept of ‘Collective Objectivity’. Following from an earlier podcast on 'Values in Science' by Rachel Brown, Fiona discusses how contemporary understandings of objectivity have become more sophisticated.
Rather than viewing objectivity in science as solely the role of individuals, today we understand there are strong social dimensions to ensuring scientific outcomes are not unduly biased. As Fiona discusses, this not only requires diversity in 'who does science' to ensure multiple perspectives are incorporated, but we also need multiple collective review mechanisms to ensure we are developing truly robust, reliable, objective outcomes.

Current research shows our current community-level systems are no longer adequate for today’s complex scientific world. Fiona forcefully argues that what is required is heavy investment in establishing stronger collective mechanisms for reinforcing the goals of scientific objectivity.
Some links related to this episode can be found below:

A transcript of this episode can be found here: https://www.hpsunimelb.org/post/episode-12-transcript

Thanks for listening to The HPS Podcast with your current hosts, Samara Greenwood and Carmelina Contarino.
You can find more about us on our blog, website, bluesky, twitter, instagram and facebook feeds.
This podcast would not be possible without the support of School of Historical and Philosophical Studies at the University of Melbourne.
www.hpsunimelb.org

  continue reading

38 episoder

Alle episoder

×
 
Loading …

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Hurtig referencevejledning