Stacey Plaskett's Further Reply In Support Of Motion To Dismiss (9/18/24)

The Epstein Chronicles

In Defendant Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett’s Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Individual and Class Action Second Amended Complaint (Case 1:23-cv-10301-AS), Congresswoman Plaskett argues that the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed for failing to meet legal standards required for their case to proceed. She contends that:

1. The claims are legally insufficient: The plaintiffs have not presented facts that would warrant the continuation of the lawsuit, especially against her in her official capacity.
2. Qualified immunity: As a government official, Plaskett argues she is protected by qualified immunity, which shields public officials from lawsuits over actions performed within their official duties unless there’s a clear violation of constitutional rights.
3. Failure to state a claim: The plaintiffs' allegations, even if accepted as true, do not establish a valid legal claim against her.
4. No personal involvement or wrongdoing: Plaskett denies any direct involvement in the actions alleged by the plaintiffs, arguing that the complaint lacks specific allegations connecting her to any wrongdoing.

(commercial at 10:34)
to contact me:
[e-mail]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.162.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.