))
$250M from Google ain’t gonna cut it: can journalists get paid? w/ Matt Pearce
Manage episode 441098365 series 3530989
Indhold leveret af Dexter Thomas. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Dexter Thomas eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.
warning: you’re about to listen to two journalists talk about the news. But the news sucks! you say — so why should we care? Well, this $250 million deal might have just made it worse. Counterintuitive, but Matt Pearce (ex LA Times) has a pretty compelling argument. We talk about this, and AI, and a bunch of other stuff.
Keep in mind that this is a pretty complicated topic, and there are some other viewpoints on this. For example, there’s this opposing stance:
And on the other hand, there's Matt summarizing the situation, where he says 'hardly anyone won, except Google':
https://mattdpearce.substack.com/p/a-deep-dive-into-googles-shady-and
And also this:
https://mindandiron.substack.com/p/mind-and-iron-gavin-newsom-may-have
There’s also Matt’s big spreadsheet on astroturfing, which we mention only briefly:
https://mattdpearce.substack.com/p/californias-sb-1327-and-the-big-tech
You can find Matt Pearce at his newsletter, which I highly recommend:
https://mattdpearce.substack.com
Anyway, this is something a lot of people probably won’t even be aware of, because it’s a really boring topic. But I think this is going to be playing out repeatedly, soon. Stay in tune.
22 episoder
Del
