Lawyer Talk: Off The Record podcast

5:17

I'm tackling a timely question from our listener, Thomas, about the legality of police waiting outside bars and following drivers. Thomas's neighbor was recently pulled over for a DUI after rolling through a stop sign. I'll walk you through why law enforcement often sets up near bars during peak drinking hours and discuss what makes certain police practices legal and constitutional in these scenarios. Remember, this isn't legal advice, but rather a chance to clear up common misconceptions and let you know the nuances of traffic stops and DUI charges. Key Takeaways Strategic Patrols : Just like hunters and fishers go where they expect to succeed, police often patrol areas near bars to catch potential drunk drivers. While this might feel unfair, it's not illegal. Traffic Violations Matter : Even minor infractions, like rolling through a stop sign, can give police a reason to pull you over. If there's an observable traffic violation, this is viewed as a justified stop under the Fourth Amendment. Expectation of Privacy : Although we have a reasonable expectation of privacy in our cars, police need a valid reason for traffic stops, and a traffic violation can provide that reason. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

1
Direct Appeal | What's The Appeal? 3:01

for 12 dage siden3:01

3:01

After a conviction, many wonder what their next steps should be, and I'm here to provide insight into that very process. As a practicing attorney with Palmer Legal Defense, I've handled numerous appeals not only in Ohio but in federal and state courts nationwide. In this episode, I focus on the direct appeal process, which moves directly from the trial court conviction to the court of appeals. I explore what mistakes can be argued based on the trial record, including evidentiary errors and courtroom rulings, and what issues must be saved for other appeals. So, if you're curious about the legal intricacies post-conviction, stay tuned as I start climbing the direct appeal ladder. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
Can Attorneys Refuse High Profile Cases? | They Don't Teach You That In Law School 16:08

for 13 dage siden16:08

16:08

What are the potential reasons a lawyer might withdraw from a case, and how do these reasons relate to attorney-client privilege? With law students Bella Mata and Troy Hendrickson, I discuss the complexities surrounding a lawyer's decision to withdraw from a case. Using a recent high-profile legal situation as a backdrop, the conversation unravels the layers of ethical and moral considerations faced by defense attorneys. Key Takeaways: Ethical Dilemmas: Withdrawal from a case is not always straightforward. Lawyers must navigate complex ethical and moral grounds, ensuring they do not compromise the client's right to effective representation. Reasons for Withdrawal: Common reasons include conflicts of interest, financial issues such as non-payment, and personal beliefs or moral conflicts that prevent a lawyer from providing unbiased representation. Judge's Role: A court must grant permission for a lawyer to withdraw from a case. The judge's decision is pivotal and can depend on various factors, including the attorney's reason for withdrawal and the potential impact on the client's right to a fair trial. Key Moments 00:00 Motivations of a Defense Lawyer 05:27 Questioning Legal Fit or Capacity 07:08 Motion to Withdraw Explained 10:30 "Judge Removal Due to Ethics" 14:24 "Rico's Uncertain Trial Status" Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
The Role of Suppression Hearings in DUI/OVI Cases | DUI 360 5:32

for 14 dage siden5:32

5:32

I tackle a crucial yet often misunderstood aspect of the legal process – the suppression hearing. After receiving a client question, I break down what a suppression hearing entails, explaining the motions filed to challenge evidence admissibility based on constitutional rights like the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. I hope you will gain insights into the burden of proof required from the prosecution, the role of the defense, and the strategic importance of evidence such as body cam and dash cam footage. For anyone facing a DUI/OVI charge or working in the legal field, understanding suppression hearings is pivotal. Key Takeaways What is a Suppression Hearing? I explain the function of a suppression hearing, emphasizing its role in challenging the admissibility of evidence in court. It’s not just legal jargon; understanding it could make a significant difference in the outcome of a case. The Legal Process: Learn about the motions filed by defense attorneys seeking to have evidence thrown out. I explain how these motions work and what constitutional violations they might allege, focusing particularly on Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. Burden of Proof: Discover who carries the burden of proof during a suppression hearing and the strategic advantage this provides the defense. I share an anecdote from his early days in law school, highlighting this key aspect. Body Cam and Dash Cam Footage: In today's technological age, evidence collection has evolved. I discuss how crucial body cam and dash cam footage have become in presenting or defending a case. Real-life Application: Through the lens of an upcoming case I am working on, you will get a firsthand understanding of how these legal principles come into play in real scenarios. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
Bribing A Judge | Lawyer Talk Q&A 9:09

for 15 dage siden9:09

9:09

In this episode of Lawyer Talk, I am breaking down a hot topic: the Supreme Court case, Snyder vs United States, and a listener's big question on bribery. Ever wondered what really counts as a bribe? Or how gratuities fit into the whole mix? I am here to clear up the confusion and make sense of it all, without diving into the political rabbit hole. I talk about how the law defines bribery and why sometimes things aren't as straightforward as they seem. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/snyder-v-united-states/ Here are some key takeaways from the discussion: Bribery vs. Gratuity : Understand the critical distinctions between a bribe (an influencing payment made before an action) and a gratuity (a gesture of gratitude after an action). The nuances are vital for legal definitions. Statutory Interpretation : The importance of accurately interpreting the law is highlighted. In Snyder vs. U.S., the Supreme Court ruled that the conduct didn't fit the statutory definition of bribery under federal law, emphasizing the consequences of prosecutorial decisions. Rigorous Ethics Compliance : The conversation sheds light on how strict ethics rules are, especially in legal and government spheres, prohibiting even small gestures like buying a Coke for a public official. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
When Legal Theater Crosses the Line | They Don't Teach You That In Law School 34:28

for 20 dage siden34:28

34:28

This episode marks a significant milestone as we celebrate our 400th episode. Since our very first recording back in February 2018, so much has changed—from starting with basic equipment in my office to creating the dynamic studio we're in today. In this episode, we reflect on the journey and evolution of our podcast, from serious legal discussions to casual and fun roundtable talks on crazy news stories. But onto what they don't teach in law school. We discuss the real-world topic that uncovers the intersection of media sensationalism and the criminal justice system. Law students Bella Mata, Troy Hendrickson and I explore the captivating case of Luigi and its broader implications within the legal landscape. From discussing past high-profile cases to understanding the ever-evolving dynamics of courts, justice, and public perception, this episode will challenge what you thought you knew about fairness, justice, and the influence of media on legal proceedings. Key Moments 00:00 Podcast Milestone: Episode 400 Celebration 05:32 Sensational Trials and Media Impact 07:23 FBI Raids on Trump and Allies 10:53 Surprise Indictment Shocks Defense Attorney 15:14 Lawyer Grandstanding: Egos Over Justice 16:40 Courtroom Strategy for Fair Trial 19:38 Luigi's Dilemma: Villain or Hero? 22:12 "Context Matters in Court Hearings" 27:55 Media Narratives and Legal Ethics 29:49 "Justice System Fairness Debate" 32:35 Demand for Fair Legal Process Here are some key takeaways - Sensationalism vs. Fairness : We examine the impact of media sensationalism on high-profile legal cases and the challenges of ensuring a fair trial amidst public and political scrutiny. Managing Media in Legal Cases : I share insights on the importance of effectively communicating with the media, especially during high-publicity cases, to manage public perception and maintain a fair judicial process. Complexities of the Justice System : Engaging discussions highlight the complexities and inconsistencies within the justice system, emphasizing that while striving for fairness, real-world application often presents unpredictable challenges. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
Ohio's Marijuana OVI Regulations | Lawyer Talk DUI 360 4:50

for 21 dage siden4:50

4:50

I break down how the state of Ohio's approach to recreational and medical marijuana intersects with OVI laws. Despite marijuana being legal under state law, driving under the influence remains a legal gray area. I explain the two main types of offenses: operating a vehicle while high and having a prohibited concentration of THC or its metabolites in your system. With drug recognition experts often under scrutiny for their methods, attorneys challenge these cases while different jurisdictions handle them differently. I offer essential advice on navigating Ohio's tricky landscape of pot-related DUI charges. And remember, when faced with such charges, getting legal assistance is key. Key Takeaways: Understanding the Law: Like alcohol, marijuana-related OVI can be charged if you're under the influence or have a prohibited concentration of THC/metabolites in your system. Proving Influence: It's tricky to prove marijuana impairment since THC can linger. Police use "Drug Recognition Experts" (DREs), but their methods can be challenged. Legal Defense: If facing an OVI charge, it's essential to hire a competent Ohio lawyer to navigate the complexities and challenge the evidence effectively. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
Why Innocent Until Proven Guilty Matters in Law | Lawyer Talk Q & A 6:24

for 22 dage siden6:24

6:24

I take you through a thought-provoking discussion on the principles of innocent until proven guilty, especially in light of the Luigi murder case. Whether you're in the legal profession or simply interested in the justice system, there are key takeaways from this episode worth reflecting on. Here are three pivotal insights: Balancing Reality with Legal Principles : I emphasize the necessity of upholding the presumption of innocence in legal practice while acknowledging the real-world instincts about a case. This dual mindset ensures that justice is not only served but perceived with fairness. The Role of Criminal Defense Lawyers : Representing seemingly guilty clients is not about agreeing with their actions but ensuring that the law is applied impartially and justly. As I note, this responsibility is crucial for maintaining a just society for all individuals. Historical and Cultural Context of Justice : I refer to historical precedents like the dialogue from A Man for All Seasons , illustrating the timeless importance of preserving legal rights, even for those we might naturally oppose. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
What's The Appeal? -A New Lawyer Talk Series on the Appellate Process 1:23

for 22 dage siden1:23

1:23

Join me, Steve Palmer, on Lawyer Talk as I launch a new series, "What's The Appeal?" We're looking into the appellate process from start to finish. Whether you're curious about appeals or simply seeking clarity, this series is for you. Over the next episodes, I'll break down each stage with a big-picture overview and a detailed look at what happens after a conviction and sentencing. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
Are Drones Changing the Boundaries of Your Privacy? | They Don't Teach You That in Law School 36:10

for 27 dage siden36:10

36:10

Drone Surveillance and Fourth Amendment Rights On the latest episode of Lawyer Talk, host Steve Palmer, along with law students Troy Hendrickson and Bella Mata, talk about the evolving legal landscape around drone technology and its implications for privacy under the Fourth Amendment. As drones become more accessible and commonplace, their use in surveillance, especially by the police, raises new legal challenges and questions. Here are some key takeaways from our discussion: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy The application of Fourth Amendment rights hinges on whether individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The use of drones introduces complexities, as they're less noticeable compared to helicopters, creating a challenge in assessing privacy violations. Legal Precedents and Modern Technology Historical legal cases like California v. Cirillo (1986) and Florida v. Riley (1989) set precedents concerning aerial surveillance. However, the modern use of drones calls for a reevaluation of these precedents to accommodate technological advancements. Property and Trespass Implications While drones offer new possibilities for surveillance, their use raises questions about trespassing and the extent to which individuals can protect their property. Debate continues on whether individuals should use force against intrusive drones without facing legal repercussions. As technology evolves, the dialogue around privacy rights needs constant attention. Key Moments 00:00 Discussing Drones: Then and Now 04:21 Supreme Court Ruling: Aerial Privacy Limits 08:59 "Privacy in Junkyard Murder Case" 10:38 FAA Regulations & Fourth Amendment Debate 15:42 Drone Curtilage and Legal Precedents 16:43 Drone Surveillance and Privacy Concerns 22:12 "Necessity of Search Warrants" 24:06 Search Warrants and Fourth Amendment Exceptions 26:57 "Search Warrant Exceptions Debate" 32:20 Evolving Case Law on Digital Privacy 34:05 Rejecting Authoritarian Control Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
Can You Refuse DUI Field Sobriety Tests Legally? | DUI 360 4:02

for 28 dage siden4:02

4:02

Many listeners wonder why and when police can request such tests during a routine stop. In this episode, I break down the legal framework surrounding these tests, explaining the standards police must meet to justify their requests. I provide valuable insights into the process. Importantly, I clarify that while police can ask for these tests, you have the right to decline. I dissect these legal principles and answer your burning questions about DUI-related matters. Remember, this is purely informational and not legal advice. Key takeaways: Reasonable Suspicion Requirement : Police need a reasonable suspicion, like the smell of alcohol, to ask you to perform a field sobriety test, but remember, you can decline. MIMS Order : When pulled over, police can order you out of your car for officer safety, thanks to the Pennsylvania vs. Mimms ruling. Legal Standards : Understanding the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause can help you better navigate your rights during a traffic stop. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
Can New Witness Testimonies Unlock a Post-Conviction Appeal? | Lawyer Talk Q & A 5:35

for 29 dage siden5:35

5:35

In this episode, I focus on the challenges and possibilities of appealing a criminal conviction long after the fact. I emphasize that while ideally appeals and legal inquiries should be pursued promptly after conviction, there are still avenues available for those who discover new evidence years later. Key Takeaways from the Episode: Immediate Action is Key: Steve emphasizes the importance of acting swiftly after a conviction, as the best time to appeal is right after the verdict. Limitations After Time Passes: The legal options become limited the longer you wait. The law favors finality, making appellate proceedings increasingly difficult as time goes by. Newly Discovered Evidence: If a case is old, uncovering newly discovered evidence can be a viable path. This could include a witness recanting their testimony or finding out that key evidence was improperly withheld by the prosecution. Thorough Investigation: Steve describes the process of employing a private investigator to review original transcripts and interview witnesses, forming a basis for motions like a new trial. Conviction Integrity Units: These units within prosecutor offices may help identify any misconduct or overlooked evidence from past convictions. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
How Criminal Convictions Affect Canadian Travel with Maggie Stewart | DUI 360 35:53

for 5 weeks siden35:53

35:53

"Understanding Canada's Inadmissibility Laws": "The inadmissibility laws apply whether it's it's not if you have a conviction in your home country per se, it's whether the conviction you have would be a conviction under a federal law in Canada." - Maggie Stewart This time, we're talking about cross-border legal issues with a special guest, Maggie Stewart from Mundial Law in California. If you travel, or plan to travel, to our neighbors to the north (Canada) this episode has something for you. What We Covered: 00:00:33 Meet Maggie Stewart : Maggie is an attorney specializing in immigration law and helps individuals—both stars and everyday people—navigate the complexities of traveling between countries like the U.S. and Canada. Her unique approach stems from her firm's name, "Mundial," meaning "world" in Spanish. 00:03:03 Canada's Border Regulations : We discuss Canada’s stringent laws around criminal inadmissibility and how they impact your travel plans—be it a vacation with family or a business trip. Maggie explains the role of FBI reports in border crossings and how Canada’s access to this data can surprise many travelers. 00:07:01 Real-Life Scenarios : Maggie shares gripping stories about her clients, from rock stars to regular folks, who have faced unexpected challenges at the Canadian border. It’s a reminder of the long-lasting impact of past legal issues. 00:18:13 Navigating Legal Complexities : Learn about rehabilitation and waivers for traveling to Canada, and why getting your FBI report before any international trip could save you a headache. Maggie provides expert tips on this essential step. 00:04:56 Broader Implications : We also touch on other countries with similar travel laws, including New Zealand, Australia, and the UK, emphasizing that self-awareness of one's legal history is crucial. 00:23:11 U.S.-Canada Relations : We take a brief detour into current events, discussing the political climate between the U.S. and Canada and what it might mean for future travel and business exchanges. Proactive Measures: If you've ever been fingerprinted or had legal charges, it's beneficial to obtain your FBI report and carry documentation when traveling. This can prevent unexpected issues at the border and make travel smoother. Maggie offers free fifteen-minute consultations when you provide your FBI report. More Key Moments 00:00 Canada's Strict Border Inadmissibility Rules 03:27 "DUI Conviction Affects Canada Entry" 08:17 Traffic Violations' Impact on Immigration 09:47 Canada Entry with Old Minor Convictions 13:56 Wildlife Antler Collection Offense 17:07 Obscure Law's Impact on Hunting 20:55 "Expunging Records in Ohio" 25:50 Canadian Visa Laws: A One-Size Issue 27:47 Assisting Canadians with U.S. Immigration 31:10 Law and Arts Advocate Journey 34:41 New Website Launch Announcement Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
Water Safety, Lease Agreements, and Medical Malpractice | Lawyer Talk Q&A 11:54

for 5 weeks siden11:54

11:54

In this Blitz Throwback QA episode, we tackle diverse and compelling issues. Jen from a trailer park raises concerns about deplorable water quality and fears of potential displacement. Steve offers insights into the intricate world of groundwater litigation, offering expert advice. Jeremy seeks guidance on early lease termination and disputes with his landlord, receiving crucial tips on protecting his rights. Randi unfolds a gripping tale of medical malpractice involving his cousin, leading to an in-depth discussion on handling severe medical negligence cases. Along the way, Steve enlightens listeners on contingency fee structures and the steps to secure adequate legal representation. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

1
Understanding Temporary Restraining Orders in Constitutional Disputes 15:38

for 6 weeks siden15:38