Artwork

Indhold leveret af Rhodri Davies. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Rhodri Davies eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå offline med appen Player FM !

Tris Lumley (NPC): Open Philanthropy

59:02
 
Del
 

Manage episode 356789505 series 2996310
Indhold leveret af Rhodri Davies. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Rhodri Davies eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

On this episode, as part of our occasional mini-series in partnership with NPC, we talk to Tris Lumley about open philanthropy: what it is, why it is important, and how we make it happen. Including:

  • What is NPC’s Open Philanthropy project? How did it come about?
  • How has NPC been putting some of its thinking about open philanthropy into practice?
  • What is the difference between “outward openness” and “inward openness” in philanthropy?
  • Do foundations (and donors) need to be more transparent?
  • If so, why? (Is this primarily about making philanthropy more legitimate, or more effective/efficient?)
  • What do they need to be open about? (e.g. income, spending, diversity of staff/trustees, how decisions are made etc).
  • How can we make use of open data in philanthropy?
  • Why might some funders be reluctant to be more open? Is this ever justified?
  • Does philanthropy need to get better at valuing different forms of knowledge?
  • How do you balance the value of experience and the value of expertise?
  • Are there challenges for traditional grantmakers when it comes to bringing communities and people with lived experience into decision making processes?
  • What does the focus on inclusion mean for our approaches to measurement?
  • How important is core-cost and multi-year funding when it comes to making philanthropy more inwardly open?
  • Is trust-based philanthropy more open (i.e. because it asks less of grantees in terms of reporting etc), or more closed (i.e. because it relies on developing trusting relationships and can therefore become cliquey)?

Related Links

  continue reading

70 episoder

Artwork
iconDel
 
Manage episode 356789505 series 2996310
Indhold leveret af Rhodri Davies. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Rhodri Davies eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

On this episode, as part of our occasional mini-series in partnership with NPC, we talk to Tris Lumley about open philanthropy: what it is, why it is important, and how we make it happen. Including:

  • What is NPC’s Open Philanthropy project? How did it come about?
  • How has NPC been putting some of its thinking about open philanthropy into practice?
  • What is the difference between “outward openness” and “inward openness” in philanthropy?
  • Do foundations (and donors) need to be more transparent?
  • If so, why? (Is this primarily about making philanthropy more legitimate, or more effective/efficient?)
  • What do they need to be open about? (e.g. income, spending, diversity of staff/trustees, how decisions are made etc).
  • How can we make use of open data in philanthropy?
  • Why might some funders be reluctant to be more open? Is this ever justified?
  • Does philanthropy need to get better at valuing different forms of knowledge?
  • How do you balance the value of experience and the value of expertise?
  • Are there challenges for traditional grantmakers when it comes to bringing communities and people with lived experience into decision making processes?
  • What does the focus on inclusion mean for our approaches to measurement?
  • How important is core-cost and multi-year funding when it comes to making philanthropy more inwardly open?
  • Is trust-based philanthropy more open (i.e. because it asks less of grantees in terms of reporting etc), or more closed (i.e. because it relies on developing trusting relationships and can therefore become cliquey)?

Related Links

  continue reading

70 episoder

Alle Folgen

×
 
Loading …

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Hurtig referencevejledning