Artwork

Indhold leveret af Frontend First, Sam Selikoff, and Ryan Toronto. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Frontend First, Sam Selikoff, and Ryan Toronto eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå offline med appen Player FM !

Server Components and the React paradigm

50:45
 
Del
 

Manage episode 358037931 series 1635850
Indhold leveret af Frontend First, Sam Selikoff, and Ryan Toronto. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Frontend First, Sam Selikoff, and Ryan Toronto eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

Ryan and Sam use some recent Twitter conversation to guide a discussion about the design and purpose of React Server Components. They talk about how client trees and rendered on the server today, why a server-side rendered prepass is wasteful in light of RSC, how hydration of a client tree works, why RSC are never hydrated, how RSC is a purely additive technology, how server and client components can be interleaved, how RSC can be refreshed in-place without loss of any client state, how RSC fits into the React paradigm despite having a unique syntax and set of capabilities, and other topics.

Topics include:

  • 0:00 - Intro
  • 4:39 - How server-side rendering and hydration work today
  • 14:51 - How RSC works, and why they’re never hydrated
  • 24:48 - What is the React paradigm, and how RSC fits into it
  • 27:54 - How RSC are revalidated
  • 33:52 - Why the goal is not to eliminate Client components
  • 38:53 - What it means for Server components and Client components to compose with each other

Links:

  continue reading

201 episoder

Artwork

Server Components and the React paradigm

Frontend First

190 subscribers

published

iconDel
 
Manage episode 358037931 series 1635850
Indhold leveret af Frontend First, Sam Selikoff, and Ryan Toronto. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Frontend First, Sam Selikoff, and Ryan Toronto eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

Ryan and Sam use some recent Twitter conversation to guide a discussion about the design and purpose of React Server Components. They talk about how client trees and rendered on the server today, why a server-side rendered prepass is wasteful in light of RSC, how hydration of a client tree works, why RSC are never hydrated, how RSC is a purely additive technology, how server and client components can be interleaved, how RSC can be refreshed in-place without loss of any client state, how RSC fits into the React paradigm despite having a unique syntax and set of capabilities, and other topics.

Topics include:

  • 0:00 - Intro
  • 4:39 - How server-side rendering and hydration work today
  • 14:51 - How RSC works, and why they’re never hydrated
  • 24:48 - What is the React paradigm, and how RSC fits into it
  • 27:54 - How RSC are revalidated
  • 33:52 - Why the goal is not to eliminate Client components
  • 38:53 - What it means for Server components and Client components to compose with each other

Links:

  continue reading

201 episoder

Semua episode

×
 
Loading …

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Hurtig referencevejledning

Lyt til dette show, mens du udforsker
Afspil