New Research Shows The Clean Air Act Always Intended To Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Damages podcast

Artwork

Science Society Social Sciences True Crime Documentaries Critical Frequency

Indhold leveret af Critical Frequency. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Critical Frequency eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

Damages « »
New Research Shows the Clean Air Act Always Intended to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions

5M ago 31:52

Del

MP3•Episode hjem

Indhold leveret af Critical Frequency. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Critical Frequency eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts vs. EPA that when the U.S. Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1970, climate science was “in its infancy,” implying that government officials could never have intended for the legislation to cover the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2022, SCOTUS doubled down on that idea, ruling in West Virginia v EPA that since the Clean Air Act didn't explicitly talk about climate change, the EPA cannot regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Now, new historical evidence unearthed by a team of Harvard University researchers led by Naomi Oreskes calls the court's understanding of the history of climate science into question, which could have major implications for the government's ability to regulate climate-changing emissions.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

… continue reading

68 episoder

#Science #Society #Social Sciences #True Crime #Documentaries #Critical Frequency

Artwork

New Research Shows the Clean Air Act Always Intended to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions

20 subscribers

published 5M ago

Del

MP3•Episode hjem

Indhold leveret af Critical Frequency. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Critical Frequency eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts vs. EPA that when the U.S. Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1970, climate science was “in its infancy,” implying that government officials could never have intended for the legislation to cover the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2022, SCOTUS doubled down on that idea, ruling in West Virginia v EPA that since the Clean Air Act didn't explicitly talk about climate change, the EPA cannot regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Now, new historical evidence unearthed by a team of Harvard University researchers led by Naomi Oreskes calls the court's understanding of the history of climate science into question, which could have major implications for the government's ability to regulate climate-changing emissions.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

… continue reading

68 episoder

#Science #Society #Social Sciences #True Crime #Documentaries #Critical Frequency

Усі епізоди

×

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

Lyt til 500+ emner

Lyt til dette show, mens du udforsker