))
Algorithm Integrity Matters: for Financial Services leaders, to enhance fairness and accuracy in data processing
«
»
Article 20. Algorithm Reviews: Public vs Private Reports
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now.
Last successful fetch was on October 30, 2025 20:37 (
What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 462005822 series 3594717
Indhold leveret af Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.
Spoken (by a human) version of this article.
- Public AI audit reports aren't universally required; they mainly apply to high-risk applications and/or specific jurisdictions.
- The push for transparency primarily concerns independent audits, not internal reviews.
- Prepare by implementing ethical AI practices and conducting regular reviews.
Note: High-risk AI systems in banking and insurance are subject to specific requirements
Links
- AI and algorithm audit guidelines vary widely and are not universally applicable. We discussed this in a previous article, outlining how the appropriateness of audit guidance depends on your circumstances.
- Audit vs Review: we explored this topic in depth in a previous article.
About this podcast
A podcast for Financial Services leaders, where we discuss fairness and accuracy in the use of data, algorithms, and AI.
Hosted by Yusuf Moolla.
Produced by Risk Insights (riskinsights.com.au).
27 episoder
Del
