River Donaghey grew up in a cult. Or at least that’s what some people called it. His parents called it a “personal-growth seminar group.” Its leader called it “one big happy family.” But there was a dark side to the world River grew up in. One he never heard about as a kid. In the 1970s and 80s, a self-help company called Lifespring took America by storm. Hundreds of thousands of people walked out of Lifespring as true believers, convinced that the seminars had the power to change the world. ...
…
continue reading
Indhold leveret af The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast-app
Gå offline med appen Player FM !
Gå offline med appen Player FM !
Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott Breaks Down Why There Was A Hung Jury In Karen Read's Trial
MP3•Episode hjem
Manage episode 427891758 series 3569233
Indhold leveret af The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott discusses the mistrial in the Karen Read case, expressing surprise that it didn't end in an outright acquittal. She explores the psychology of jury deliberations, noting that deeply entrenched opinions likely prevented a unanimous verdict. The conversation highlights the problematic behavior of Trooper Proctor, whose unprofessional and derogatory comments about Read undermined the prosecution. Scott emphasizes that the conflicting expert testimonies and the weak presentation by the prosecution made it difficult for the jury to reach a conclusive decision. Both Scott and Brueski suggest that retrying the case may not yield a different outcome due to the persistent issues with key witnesses and the lack of compelling evidence.
### Main Points:
- The Karen Read trial ended in a mistrial due to a divided jury.
- Jurors likely entered deliberations with entrenched opinions, making consensus difficult.
- Trooper Proctor's unprofessional behavior and derogatory comments negatively impacted the prosecution's case.
- Conflicting expert testimonies added to the jury's confusion and indecision.
- The prosecution's weak presentation failed to provide a clear narrative.
- The lack of conclusive evidence makes a conviction in a retrial unlikely.
- Scott and Brueski question the value of retrying the case given the recurring issues with key witnesses.
### Relevant Hashtags:
#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #ShavaunScott #TrooperProctor #Mistrial #LegalStrategy #PsychologyOfJury
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
### Main Points:
- The Karen Read trial ended in a mistrial due to a divided jury.
- Jurors likely entered deliberations with entrenched opinions, making consensus difficult.
- Trooper Proctor's unprofessional behavior and derogatory comments negatively impacted the prosecution's case.
- Conflicting expert testimonies added to the jury's confusion and indecision.
- The prosecution's weak presentation failed to provide a clear narrative.
- The lack of conclusive evidence makes a conviction in a retrial unlikely.
- Scott and Brueski question the value of retrying the case given the recurring issues with key witnesses.
### Relevant Hashtags:
#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #ShavaunScott #TrooperProctor #Mistrial #LegalStrategy #PsychologyOfJury
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
440 episoder
MP3•Episode hjem
Manage episode 427891758 series 3569233
Indhold leveret af The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott discusses the mistrial in the Karen Read case, expressing surprise that it didn't end in an outright acquittal. She explores the psychology of jury deliberations, noting that deeply entrenched opinions likely prevented a unanimous verdict. The conversation highlights the problematic behavior of Trooper Proctor, whose unprofessional and derogatory comments about Read undermined the prosecution. Scott emphasizes that the conflicting expert testimonies and the weak presentation by the prosecution made it difficult for the jury to reach a conclusive decision. Both Scott and Brueski suggest that retrying the case may not yield a different outcome due to the persistent issues with key witnesses and the lack of compelling evidence.
### Main Points:
- The Karen Read trial ended in a mistrial due to a divided jury.
- Jurors likely entered deliberations with entrenched opinions, making consensus difficult.
- Trooper Proctor's unprofessional behavior and derogatory comments negatively impacted the prosecution's case.
- Conflicting expert testimonies added to the jury's confusion and indecision.
- The prosecution's weak presentation failed to provide a clear narrative.
- The lack of conclusive evidence makes a conviction in a retrial unlikely.
- Scott and Brueski question the value of retrying the case given the recurring issues with key witnesses.
### Relevant Hashtags:
#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #ShavaunScott #TrooperProctor #Mistrial #LegalStrategy #PsychologyOfJury
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
### Main Points:
- The Karen Read trial ended in a mistrial due to a divided jury.
- Jurors likely entered deliberations with entrenched opinions, making consensus difficult.
- Trooper Proctor's unprofessional behavior and derogatory comments negatively impacted the prosecution's case.
- Conflicting expert testimonies added to the jury's confusion and indecision.
- The prosecution's weak presentation failed to provide a clear narrative.
- The lack of conclusive evidence makes a conviction in a retrial unlikely.
- Scott and Brueski question the value of retrying the case given the recurring issues with key witnesses.
### Relevant Hashtags:
#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #ShavaunScott #TrooperProctor #Mistrial #LegalStrategy #PsychologyOfJury
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
440 episoder
Semua episode
×Velkommen til Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.