#331: Section 230’s Long Path To SCOTUS Tech Policy podcast

Artwork

Tech TechFreedom Social Media

Indhold leveret af TechFreedom. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af TechFreedom eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

Tech Policy Podcast « »
#331: Section 230’s Long Path to SCOTUS

1+ y ago 59:34

Del

MP3•Episode hjem

Indhold leveret af TechFreedom. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af TechFreedom eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

The Supreme Court has never heard a Section 230 case—until now. Earlier this month, the justices agreed to review Gonzalez v. Google, in which the plaintiffs argue that YouTube’s “targeted recommendation” of videos falls outside Section 230 immunity. How did we get Section 230? Why is it important? What would the Internet look like without it? Emma Llansó, director of the Free Expression Project at the Center for Democracy & Technology, joins the show to explain how Section 230 came to be, how it has been implemented over the last quarter century, why Congress’s one amendment of it (via FOSTA) was a disaster, and why the upcoming Supreme Court case is so crucial.

… continue reading

374 episoder

#Tech #TechFreedom #Social Media

Artwork

#331: Section 230’s Long Path to SCOTUS

Tech Policy Podcast

23 subscribers

published 1+ y ago

Del

MP3•Episode hjem

Indhold leveret af TechFreedom. Alt podcastindhold inklusive episoder, grafik og podcastbeskrivelser uploades og leveres direkte af TechFreedom eller deres podcastplatformspartner. Hvis du mener, at nogen bruger dit ophavsretligt beskyttede værk uden din tilladelse, kan du følge processen beskrevet her https://da.player.fm/legal.

The Supreme Court has never heard a Section 230 case—until now. Earlier this month, the justices agreed to review Gonzalez v. Google, in which the plaintiffs argue that YouTube’s “targeted recommendation” of videos falls outside Section 230 immunity. How did we get Section 230? Why is it important? What would the Internet look like without it? Emma Llansó, director of the Free Expression Project at the Center for Democracy & Technology, joins the show to explain how Section 230 came to be, how it has been implemented over the last quarter century, why Congress’s one amendment of it (via FOSTA) was a disaster, and why the upcoming Supreme Court case is so crucial.

… continue reading

374 episoder

#Tech #TechFreedom #Social Media

Усі епізоди

×

Velkommen til Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

Lyt til 500+ emner